Berikutini Screenshot perbandingan dari HDD 7200rmp dengan HDD 5400rpm: Kalau kamu lihat memang terdapat perbedaan yang cukup signifikan antara HDD 7200rpm dengan yang 5400rpm. Bahkan bisa dibilang 2 kali lipatnya. Namun begitu, speed HDD 7200rpm tidak bisa menyaingi SSD yang punya kisaran di 500. Tap cukup lumayan ketimbang 5400rpm. Врубрике «Внешний жесткий диск 2tb western digital elements desktop» в Уфе найдено 337 предложений . Сортировать: Актуальности Названию Цене . Показать по: 20 30 40 50. TheRyzen 3 3200G even clocked at 4 AMD Ryzen 3 3200G; $420 Ayrıca Bkz Acer Aspire A515-43 AMD Ryzen 3 3200U Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx, 2600Mhz Buy AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Quad-Core 3 Buy AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Quad-Core 3. Search Ryzen 3 3200g Server. Today AMD also introduces Ryzen 3000 series APUs: The Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen 5 3400G, both based on Zen+ architecture AMD Radeon Vega 8, 2 GB Availability: Out of stock 6 GHz by default, but can boost up to 4 GHz, depending on the workload 0: Integrated Graphics; Type 0: Integrated Graphics; Type. WDRED™ Plus: The NAS Drive For Your Network Attached Drive Array. Tackle Intensity with WD Red™ Plus.Packed with power to handle the small- to medium-sized business NAS environments and increased workloads for SOHO customers, WD Red™ Plus is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on systems using ZFS and other file systems.. "/> 3W(Leerlauf) Hard Disk Drives (HDD) Testberichte Günstig kaufen 5" Garansi Resmi 3 Tahun WD 3TB My Passport Wireless Pro Portable External Hard Drive - iOS/Android Compatible - Wi-Fi AC, SD, USB 3 western digital wd40ezrx [4tb sata600]全国各地のお店の価格情報がリアルタイムにわかるのは価格 Western Digital has started shipping its newest and largest hard drive TheWestern Digital WD Black 4TB Hard Disk Drive drive features a dual-core processor that offers twice the processing capability as a standard single-core processor to maximize drive performance. With 256MB of cache, WD's Dynamic Cache Technology improves performance in real time to allocate and optimize cache between reads and writes. AGACXB1. Higher revolutions per minute represent a faster hard drive, but the rate of media transfer is just as important for data storage solutions. IBM gets the credit for inventing the concept of the hard disc drive HDD more than 50 years ago. Back then, HDD technology included washing machine-sized monstrosities with platters up to 14 inches in diameter spinning at a mere 1,200 revolutions per minute RPM. Since then, the industry has experienced dramatic innovation. The physical footprint of hard drives has continued to decrease while storage density and performance have dramatically increased. But even as hard drive technology has matured, the way of measuring the performance of new hard drive models has remained relatively consistent and closely related to two specificationsThe density of bits storage on the circular platters — called areal densityThe speed at which the platters rotate — called RPM The performance of a hard drive is most effectively measured by how fast data can be transferred from the spinning media platters through the read/write head and passed to a host computer. This is commonly referred to as data throughput and usually measured in gigabytes or gigabits per second. In either case, data throughput is directly related to how densely data is packed on the hard drive platters and how fast these platters spin. Comparing measurement methods For the areal density specification, we can measure data density on a hard drive in two ways bits per inch BPI and tracks per inch TPI. As tracks are placed closer together, TPI increases. Similarly, as data bits are placed closer and closer to each other along a track, BPI increases. Together, these represent areal density. As a rule, when areal density increases on a hard drive, so does data throughput performance. This is because the data bits pass by the read/write head of the hard drive faster, which leads to faster data rates. For the RPM specification, platters need to spin faster to increase performance in a hard drive. This results in moving the data bits past the read/write head faster, which results in higher data rates. Hard drives have been engineered with spin rates as low as 1,200 RPM and as high as 15K RPM. But today’s most common RPM rates, in both laptop and desktop PCs, are between 5,400 and 7,200 RPM. Given two identically designed hard drives with the same areal densities, a 7,200 RPM drive will deliver data about 33% faster than the 5,400 RPM drive. Consequently, this specification is important when evaluating the expected performance of a hard drive or when comparing different HDD models. Solid state hybrid drives make RPM largely irrelevant It’s no surprise that when many people begin evaluating the expected performance of the new solid state hybrid drive SSHD technology, they look at the RPM specification since an SSHD is basically an HDD with a bit of solid state technology integrated into the device. So RPM should still matter, right? The truth is, the RPM of an SSHD device is largely irrelevant. Here’s why SSHD design is based on identifying frequently used data and placing it in the solid state drive SSD or NAND flash portion of the drive. NAND flash media is very fast, partly because there are no moving parts — since it’s made of solid state circuitry. Therefore, when data is requested by host computers there is typically not a dependence on pulling this data directly from the spinning media in the hard drive portion. Sometimes, however, data will be requested that is not in the NAND flash, and only during these instances does the hard drive portion of the device become a bottleneck. Since the technology is so effective at identifying and storing frequently used data in the NAND area, SSHD technology is much more efficient in delivering data to a host computer quickly. This result may be clearly observed by comparing the PC Mark Vantage storage scores of second- and third-generation Seagate SSHD technology and traditional 5,400 and 7,200 RPM HDDs. Although third–generation SSHD technology is based on a 5,400 RPM HDD platform, the technology actually delivers faster performance than the previous generation product based on a 7,200 RPM HDD platform. Improvements in core SSHD technology and NAND flash systems explain such progress, and also exemplify why RPM is no longer as meaningful when evaluating SSHD technology. Summary When maximising the performance of your laptop computer, you don’t have to be bound by older storage technologies or performance criteria. Instead, let solid state hybrid drives take your digital lifestyle to a higher level. 1 Hello, I am upgrading a family member's old laptop and I have a few 5400rpm SSHDs and 7200rpm HDDs lying around. Which would be better for ordinary day to day use? This person doesn't play games and doesn't transfer a lot of large files often. Just internet usage and occasional movies. The options I have are 1 used Seagate SSHD with 5400 rpm speed ST500LM000 and 2 new HGST HDD 7200 rpms HTS725050A7 or new Toshiba HDD 7200 rpm MQ01ACF050 According to userbenchmark, the HDD is effectively faster as sequential read/write is weighted much more heavily. But youtube reviews/tests seem to prefer the SSHD. According to Seagate, their SSHD is better no surprise? Last edited Oct 17, 2018 2 Those seagates have never really been reliable at all... Either go full ssd or go home. If an ssd is not an option then take the Toshiba. Their drives are pretty good 3 SSHDs are like a oversize cache cost solution. Bulk of operations will still be reliant on how fast the platter rotates and head actuates. Since they aint gaming, go with the cheapest option which is the Toshiba Drive, which still has a faster rotation than the Seagate. 4 Those seagates have never really been reliable at all... Either go full ssd or go home. If an ssd is not an option then take the Toshiba. Their drives are pretty good Are you saying seagates in general are unreliable or just their SSHDs are reliable? When you say unreliable, do you mean high failure rates? I already have these SSHDs and HDDs. SSHDs are like a oversize cache cost solution. Bulk of operations will still be reliant on how fast the platter rotates and head actuates. Since they aint gaming, go with the cheapest option which is the Toshiba Drive Cost is not a factor because I already have both lying around. Which is better in real world applications for a person who just browses Google Chrome and uses a few programs like media player and microsoft office? We're not dealing with a lot of large files here so these commonly used programs should be on the SSD cache right? 5 Are you saying seagates in general are unreliable or just their SSHDs are reliable? When you say unreliable, do you mean high failure rates? I already have these SSHDs and HDDs. Cost is not a factor because I already have both lying around. Drop the 5400 in and call it a day. The only way a 7200 drive gets better is when a 7200 sshd is in place. Drawback of a 7200 drive over a 5400 is power. 6 Of those choices, I would go with 7200 RPM. Moderately fast and reliable. The SSHD has 8 GB of moderately fast data access followed by 500 GB of painfully slow. If you hammer an SSHD with a lot of operations, that painfully slow will rear its ugly head. 7 Of those choices, I would go with 7200 RPM. Moderately fast and reliable. The SSHD has 8 GB of moderately fast data access followed by 500 GB of painfully slow. If you hammer an SSHD with a lot of operations, that painfully slow will rear its ugly head. Not that bad for a general purpose laptop, only bad for a Gaming unit 8 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. 9 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. Here is a comprehensive list. 10 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. 1 Wouldn't running the OS be faster on the SSHD cache? 2 W7 3 Backblaze statistics show Toshiba and HGST both had comparable or lower rates of failure than Western Digital drives...and HGST has been owned by WD for a while anyways. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 11 I would say generally mechanical hdd in laptop fail pretty quickly with heavy use. I have an acer laptop with Toshiba HDD yet that drive fail. HDD are not really tolerant to heat and shock of carrying day to day at least from my experience. Laptop drive bay design and shock reducing features do play a part., despite that from my experience looking at laptop with even good hdd protection features like a Fujitsu, they do start showing smart errors. If they are just used for home use, they would be fine I guess. I would not say HDD is that slow, they are pretty tolerable for normal use though you do feel the speed difference. I would generally recommend ssd nowadays even the very cheap ones with lower capacity they are superior for laptop use. The HDD use for storage instead be it putting in into an external drive case or using a cd drive caddy in a laptop if you have one. Taking out the cd drive and using an adapter to install a hdd into the cd drive slot. 12 OS after few tries will get faster - sure if files it uses frequently are located in SS part of that SSHD. Problems will start when cache gets full after few days. After that time, doing any file transfers or operations outside of it will be slower than on 7200RPM drive. Also, If your mom/sister likes to watch movies few times in a row or go back to fav. ones few times a week, they will be transfered to fast cache at some point - which will be awesome for their performance, don't you think ? 13 1 Wouldn't running the OS be faster on the SSHD cache? 2 W7 3 Backblaze statistics show Toshiba and HGST both had comparable or lower rates of failure than Western Digital drives...and HGST has been owned by WD for a while anyways. SSHD would be faster yes, but again no where near as fast as a SSD. Windows 7? then you should be fine honestly, any 7200RPM drive will run it fine and at a descent speed, doesnt really require and SSD it be just a bonus really. Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. and this has been shown over and over again year by year. WD might "own" them but they are still a completely different company/factory, dont get confused by that Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. 14 SSHD would be faster yes, but again no where near as fast as a SSD. Windows 7? then you should be fine honestly, any 7200RPM drive will run it fine and at a descent speed, doesnt really require and SSD it be just a bonus really. Yes, a SSD is going to be faster than an SSHD or an HDD. But I have a spare SSHD and a spare HDD on hand to use for this old and cheap laptop. I don't have a spare SSD on hand for this unless someone wants to trade me an SSD for my SSHD. Is Windows 10 that much slower than Windows 7 when running on a harddrive? Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. and this has been shown over and over again year by year. WD might "own" them but they are still a completely different company/factory, dont get confused by that Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. Backblaze has other test years too with more WD vs HGST and Toshiba harddrives. In the 2015 test for example, 1046x WDC WD30EFRX 3TB drives had a failure rate while 1000x HGST HDS723030 3TB drives had a failure rate. In Q4 2016, the WDC 3TB had a failure rate out of 1105x drives, while the HGST HDS72... 3TB had a failure rate of out of 978x drives. According to the charts, more drives does not necessarily equal less failure rate. After you get past a certain number, the extremely lucky and extremely unlucky drives will no longer skewer the average very much, and some very high drive count models have high failure rates while others do not. Seagate had the most drive in 2016 yet the 2nd highest failure rate at Toshiba had the least number of drives at 237 yet a middle-failure rate of HGST had the 2nd most drives yet the lowest failure rate at .60%, and WDC had a higher failure rate as well. In the 2013-2016 chart here, It seems that WDC's 3TB Red series with 1102 drives had a high failure rate at HGST's 3TB drive 1027 drives, had a failure rate less than half that of What Backblaze statistics seems to tell us that model of the harddrive matters more than brands. Some brands such as Seagate have both really good models with low failure failure out of 1889 drives and really bad models with high failures failure out of 4247 drives. The best model of the series seems to be HGST's HDS5C4040BLE640 with drives that only have a failure rate. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 15 Yes, a SSD is going to be faster than an SSHD or an HDD. But I have a spare SSHD and a spare HDD on hand to use for this old and cheap laptop. I don't have a spare SSD on hand for this unless someone wants to trade me an SSD for my SSHD. Is Windows 10 that much slower than Windows 7 when running on a harddrive? Yes it is a big difference, I have experienced this multiple times with many many Clients and my own computers, 10 is very slow on a Mechanical HDD compared to 7. According to the charts, more drives does not necessarily equal less failure rate. No not failure rate but the percentage is less and thats what they are showing, a percentage. More HDD's the less the percentage is. I have been building and doing upgrades and working on peoples computers for almost 15yrs with a base of up to 100 000 people and I havent had to return 1 WD Black hard drive or WD Raptor yet because of normal failure. Ive seen WD Greens and Blues die, but no where near as many as HSGT, Seagate or Toshiba Drives. In the real world you get what you pay for, get a WD Black with 5 yr warranty and you wont regret it, there is a reason why they have 5yr warranty on them. 16 I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. If the only thing you care about is speed then go with sshdd, otherwise go with anything but seagate. Forgetting backblaze's stats from personal experience i had more failed seagate hdds than from any other manufacturer. 17 Normally I'd stay away from SSHDD and go full SSD but since you want to use what you already have, why not give it a try? Since as you stated, it's for a laptop that will typically see only internet usage and movies, most of what your family member does should be able to fit into the SSD cache portion of that drive. Also, since you have the mechanical drives in hand as well, use one of them to clone the SSHDD and you'll be fine if there's any mechanical failures. Hell, in that instance you could even swap between the drives to see what they prefer which in the end is the most important opinion of them all. Edit Just remember to use the SSHDD in a "normal" manner so it caches what is most accessed by your everyday behavior before truly evaluating its performance. 18 Go ssd or go home If this is not an option, go with the 7200 hdd....especially for the uses you state and since the machine will most likely be plugged in most of the time, the difference in power draw won't matter.... 19 I'd say go with the SSHD. Even at 5400RPM, for normal uses the SSHD will give a better experience than a 7200RPM drive. Plus, if they run the computer off battery the lower power draw of the 5400RPM drive will make the battery last longer. I used one of these 5400RPM SSHDs as a main drive in one of my desktop PCs for the longest time and it worked quite well. Basic tasks like browsing the web, youtube, and Office were much snappier than the 7200RPM hard drive the SSHD replaced. Though, not where near an SSD. Dropping a $30 SSD in a machine as the system drive is one of the best things you can do to wake an older machine up. I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. All the SSHDs were originally 5400RPM, even WD's. They were done as a compromise for laptop users to still give them the battery life of a 5400RPM drive, but boost the performance. It works quite well in practice actually. 20 If your having to buy these drives new, skip both of them and as many have said above, get a full SSD. Messing about with HDs and SSHDs in a laptop isn't worth the hassle and with the cost of a 120Gb or 240Gb or even 480Gb SSD now being as cheap as they are, I'd never consider even thinking about it and just grab one. Doesn't really matter as such on the make of SSD as any will be much better than a standard SSD or SSHD. Windows 10 on a HD is painful, had one in my laptop, got rid of it even though it was 8 times the size of the SSD I have put in its place 2Tb v 250Gb or something near to 21 So 1/3 of the people here are telling me to use the 5400rpm SSHDs, 1/3 here are telling me to use the 7200 rpm HDDs, and the other 1/3 are telling me to buy a SSD even though I already have the HDD/SSHD on hand. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 22 In that case, do a coin toss between 5400RPM and 7200RPM. Winner gets the job 23 Yes it is a big difference, I have experienced this multiple times with many many Clients and my own computers, 10 is very slow on a Mechanical HDD compared to 7. No not failure rate but the percentage is less and thats what they are showing, a percentage. More HDD's the less the percentage is. I have been building and doing upgrades and working on peoples computers for almost 15yrs with a base of up to 100 000 people and I havent had to return 1 WD Black hard drive or WD Raptor yet because of normal failure. Ive seen WD Greens and Blues die, but no where near as many as HSGT, Seagate or Toshiba Drives. In the real world you get what you pay for, get a WD Black with 5 yr warranty and you wont regret it, there is a reason why they have 5yr warranty on them. Cool story bro, been doing this 20 I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. If the only thing you care about is speed then go with sshdd, otherwise go with anything but seagate. Forgetting backblaze's stats from personal experience i had more failed seagate hdds than from any other manufacturer. Low cost solution. Bluescreendeath just drop the 5400RPM in and call it a day, it's a general purpose laptop, not specializing in anything, battery life will be more important than super performance. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 24 MQ01ACF050 only has a 16 MB cache which is ridiculously tiny. I wouldn't use that one at all. HTS725050A7 has better sequential performance, lower power consumption, and likely better reliability don't have to worry about MLC wear. ST500LM000 has better random access performance. 25 If you aren't doing too many writes SSHD is the better solution, 7200 rpm drive if you need to write lots of data. Of course I'd suggest a cheap TLC drive, if storage space isn't an issue & price isn't a major concern. TrancëJay Geek Registrado Mensagens 3 Curtidas Responder Faon Super Participante Registrado 824 Mensagens 0 Curtidas 2 Por Faon 03/01/2003 - 0313 Bem, se o que vc quer é espaço para seus arquivos fique com o e 5400, de preferencia novo! Mas se vc quer velocidade e tem um equipamento que não seja gargalo ao desempenho do hd fica com o de 7200 rpm. Pessoalmente eu optaria por espaço. Abraços Eurilano Albuquerque Lambreta General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 0 Curtidas 3 Por Lambreta 03/01/2003 - 0414 Caso ambos tenham mesmo cache, a diferença não será tão gritante. Pegue o de 60gb mesmo. Algumas pessoas aqui do fórum mesmo tinham os Quantum LCTs de 5400rpm com apenas 128K de memo cache.. pouquíssimo, o que os tornam um dos mais se nao o mais lento dos hd de baixo custo. Aí mudaram pra um de 7200 rpm e 2mb de cache e saíram aos berros dizendo que faz diferença ehheehe realmente, neste caso faz e muita. Mas sendo de mesmo cache os hds...nem tanto. Lambreta Protesto Não demora muito vão obrigar a colocar o CPF pra vender no site. Deixem isso a cargo interessado saber. Poupar pergunta? Ah, pera aí né!! HomenAsus Veterano Registrado Mensagens 2 Curtidas 4 Por HomenAsus 03/01/2003 - 0505 Tava dando uma olhada nos preços em alguns sites e reparei que com o d... Como disse o colega, se tiverem o mesmo cache, faz sim muita diferença. Mas como vc mesmo disse que o que interessa pra vc é espaço, não perca tempo, compre logo o de 60 GB. No seu caso vc precisa mais de espaço; eu mesmo não preciso tanto de espaço, por isso me viro bem com um de 20 GB e rpm. DoMiNaDo Tô em todas Registrado Mensagens 0 Curtidas 5 Por DoMiNaDo 03/01/2003 - 1129 Na minha opinião se vc não quiser gastar muito em um hd de grande capacidade e de 7200RPM, pode optar por um de 5400RPM mesmo... a diferença será sentida mais na manipulação de grandes arquivos... Concordo plenamente com q o lambreta disse... tendo um bom cache 2MB no mínimo o desempenho será bom... 's Freitas Membro Junior Registrado 81 Mensagens 0 Curtidas 6 Por Freitas 04/01/2003 - 0614 Cara adquiri um HD de 80 GB Zerado por 400,00 contos com Cache de 2 mb e não me arrependo. Tinha a mesma necessidade que a sua realmente e duvida que vc e optei por espaço. Não me arrependo e te aconselho a comprar o de 5400 rpm. Intel Pentium 4 HT Asus P4P800, HD 120GB - rpm Cache 2MB UDMA 5, DDR 512 MB RAM, ATI Readon 9500 Pro 128 MB, DVD, Gravador LG 52X, Monitor Sansung 17', Hardmodem Robotics Gaming Modem 56 kbs - Lambreta General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 0 Curtidas 7 Por Lambreta 04/01/2003 - 0618 Cara adquiri um HD de 80 GB Zerado por 400,00 contos com Cache de 2 mb e não me arrependo. Tinha a mesma necessidade ... onde comprou? qual marca? Lambreta Protesto Não demora muito vão obrigar a colocar o CPF pra vender no site. Deixem isso a cargo interessado saber. Poupar pergunta? Ah, pera aí né!! Freitas Membro Junior Registrado 81 Mensagens 0 Curtidas 8 Por Freitas 04/01/2003 - 0634 Sei q vcs não botão miuta fé no Mercado Livre, mas costumo comprar sempre dos vendedores Líder ou com boas qualificações e não me arrependo. Foi lá que adquirir. O modelo é o Spinpoint série V40-SV8004H Características Disco rígido de alta performance de 3,5" 80,0GB de capacidade formatada Arquitetura baseada em Processador de Sinal Digital DSP de alta velocidade Compatível com Ultra DMA 100 Velocidade de RPM Tempo de busca médio de 8,9ms Correção de erros OTF com 7 canais de interleave Concordante com ImpactGuard™ NoiseGuard™ Atte, Sérgio Intel Pentium 4 HT Asus P4P800, HD 120GB - rpm Cache 2MB UDMA 5, DDR 512 MB RAM, ATI Readon 9500 Pro 128 MB, DVD, Gravador LG 52X, Monitor Sansung 17', Hardmodem Robotics Gaming Modem 56 kbs - Lambreta General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 0 Curtidas 9 Por Lambreta 04/01/2003 - 0839 Sei q vcs não botão miuta fé no Mercado Livre, mas costumo comprar sempre dos vendedores Líder ou com boas qualificaç... qual foi o vendedor? Lambreta Protesto Não demora muito vão obrigar a colocar o CPF pra vender no site. Deixem isso a cargo interessado saber. Poupar pergunta? Ah, pera aí né!! Edney General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 57 Curtidas 10 Por Edney 04/01/2003 - 1014 He he he, eu saí de um LCT20 30Gb para um Maxtor D740X, nossa, que diferença. Claro que o LCT20 tinha meros 4500rpm segundo o que dizem por aí. Depois que o D740X queimou, estou com um Samsung que foi muito elogiado pela PCs. O Samsung é 5400rpm, e apesar de um ótimo desempenho, obviamente não se compara com os de 7200pm. Mas se espaço é mais importante, fique com HD maior. PhD in biomedical engineering, medical radiology technologist, technician in electronics and programmer in computacional nuclear physics simulation. i7 260016Gb VengeanceGA-H67A-UD3H-B3 2X1TB Raid 0+1Tb GF GTX 650 EMU-0404 Pioneer BDR-207 C3Tech 500W PFC Freitas Membro Junior Registrado 81 Mensagens 0 Curtidas 11 Por Freitas 04/01/2003 - 1043 O Vendedor foi o RCBRIO 22 - Mercado Lider Comprei via sedex a cobrar e o Vendedor é do Rio. Se quizer referência diga que o comprar foi o TicoBR de Itabuna-Ba. Intel Pentium 4 HT Asus P4P800, HD 120GB - rpm Cache 2MB UDMA 5, DDR 512 MB RAM, ATI Readon 9500 Pro 128 MB, DVD, Gravador LG 52X, Monitor Sansung 17', Hardmodem Robotics Gaming Modem 56 kbs - fcm Cyber Highlander Registrado Mensagens 474 Curtidas 12 Por fcm 04/01/2003 - 1658 Caso ambos tenham mesmo cache, a diferença não será tão gritante. Pegue o de 60gb mesmo. Algumas pessoas aqui do f... Voltando ao papo de HDs... ae kra, trocou seu Plus AS pelo de 60GB lah?? Putz, eu sou totalmente a favor de HDs de 7200RPM... o meu primo tem um Barracuda de 40GB de 5400RPM e perde muito feio pro meu Plus AS... o micro eh um PIII800936, mobo Soyo, cabo de 80 vias e td, eu instalei os drivers até e se sente muita diferença entre os dois... o meu primo tem um P200MMX com um LCT10 de 15GB sendo servidor, e eu fui fazer um backup por rede... eu enviei os dados em un 20 minutos, e pra voltar demorou mais de 40... claro que o processador também influencia um pouco, mas nem tanto, já que o HD é que é muito usado e a rede é só de 10mbps... eu testei tb aqui um Maxtor D541X e achei ele tb razoável, mas eu sempre prefiro um de capacidade menor, mas de velocidade maior... estou com um Plus AS7200RPM de 10GB e nem uso todo o espaço dele e se for comprar outro HD, compro outro Plus AS 10GB e faço Raid0... M Dell Vostro 3550 i7-2670QM 16GB DDR3 SSD Crucial 480GB+ WD Black 750GB 7200RPM HTPC Phenom II X4 945 MA785GM-US2H 8GB DDR2-1000 HD7770 Ghz Sandisk Plus 120GB DSA-5060V Oldschool XP-M 2200+3700+ A7N8X-E Deluxe 2GB DDR440 X1650 Pro WD 80GB Lambreta General de Pijama Registrado Mensagens 0 Curtidas 13 Por Lambreta 04/01/2003 - 1830 Voltando ao papo de HDs... ae kra, trocou seu Plus AS pelo de 60GB lah?? Ainda não.. semana que vem fechamos devido as viagens de final de ano 8 Mas vou pegar o 60gb e vender meu 20gb.. Sobre o LCT, agora nao sei se ele é 4500 ou 5200. tenho uma Expert aqui qeu fala dele... mas o cache é 128K. Sobre tamanho x velocidade.. aí é gosto mesmo. No meu caso, este meu 20gb me atende bem e pintou um boa oportunidade de pegar um 60gb de 7200 barato... ai vale e troca. Se eu tivesse um 10gb putz, só o UT2k3 levava 1/4 dele sem dó trocaria por um maior de 5400 caso o $ falasse alto. Vai de cada um isso... Lambreta Protesto Não demora muito vão obrigar a colocar o CPF pra vender no site. Deixem isso a cargo interessado saber. Poupar pergunta? Ah, pera aí né!! fcm Cyber Highlander Registrado Mensagens 474 Curtidas 14 Por fcm 04/01/2003 - 2126 Ainda não.. semana que vem fechamos devido as viagens de final de ano 8 Mas vou pegar o 60gb e vender meu 20g... O LCT diz ser de 5400 mas é de 4500... eu to procurando um outro de 10GB talvez pra um Raid, mas tah soda... eu nem to usando mto espaço aki... tenho 1 partições uma com arquivos e outra com SO e programas e td rlz... nem dah pra acreditar qta coisa tem aki em 10GB... WinXP, Corel Draw 7 com td, Office 2000 com td, Micrografx Picture Publisher8, uns jogos, td ké download útil, 2 filmes em Divx, 91 mp3 e mpegs, e ainda com 3GB livres... eçe eu aguarantiu! M Dell Vostro 3550 i7-2670QM 16GB DDR3 SSD Crucial 480GB+ WD Black 750GB 7200RPM HTPC Phenom II X4 945 MA785GM-US2H 8GB DDR2-1000 HD7770 Ghz Sandisk Plus 120GB DSA-5060V Oldschool XP-M 2200+3700+ A7N8X-E Deluxe 2GB DDR440 X1650 Pro WD 80GB Hotmachine Membro Junior Registrado 76 Mensagens 0 Curtidas 15 Por Hotmachine 04/01/2003 - 2133 Cara adquiri um HD de 80 GB Zerado por 400,00 contos com Cache de 2 mb e não me arrependo. Tinha a mesma necessidade ...Vc aconselha ele comprar um de 5400rpm, vc ja usou um de 7200rpm?????????????????????????????????????????????????? "Não chores por mim morena, um dia eu chego lá.. "Agora que chegamos lá, vamos trabalhar para melhorar." Responder Tópico Sementara kebanyakan orang akan mengabaikan hard drive, mereka adalah pilihan yang tepat untuk menyimpan informasi yang sangat besar. Meskipun hard drive sekarang dapat berputar hingga 15000 RPM, drive yang paling umum untuk desktop dan laptop adalah antara 5400 dan 7200 RPM. Pengambilan KunciHard drive 7200 RPM memiliki kecepatan baca/tulis yang lebih cepat daripada drive 5400 drive 5400 RPM mengkonsumsi lebih sedikit daya dan menghasilkan lebih sedikit panas daripada drive 7200 drive 7200 RPM lebih baik untuk tugas-tugas intensif kinerja; Drive 5400 RPM cocok untuk pengguna yang sadar drive 7200 RPM memutar piringannya 50% lebih cepat daripada drive 5400 RPM, yang berarti dapat membaca dan menulis data lebih cepat. Ini membuat drive 7200 RPM lebih cocok untuk tugas yang membutuhkan transfer data berkecepatan tinggi. Drive 5400 RPM lebih lambat dan mungkin lebih cocok untuk penggunaan komputer menyimpan artikel ini untuk nanti? Klik hati di pojok kanan bawah untuk menyimpan ke kotak artikel Anda sendiri!5400 RPM adalah hard drive yang menawarkan kecepatan transfer file yang lebih lambat. Namun, mereka menggunakan lebih sedikit daya yang juga berarti bahwa mereka menggunakan lebih sedikit panas dan memberikan operasi yang lebih juga lebih terjangkau. Drive 5400 RPM direkomendasikan jika Anda ingin bekerja dengan daya rendah Server. Hard drive 7200 RPM memungkinkan sistem operasi atau program Anda berfungsi lebih cepat dan dengan cara yang lebih efisien. Jadi, lebih cocok bagi Anda yang ingin menjalankan aplikasi HDD atau menginstal sistem operasi. Keuntungan dari hard disk 7200 RPM adalah kinerjanya yang luar biasa. Hard drive 7200 RPM biasanya cenderung mengungguli hard drive 5400 RPM. Tabel perbandinganParameter Perbandingan 5400 RPM Hard Drive7200 RPM Hard DriveCocok untuk Untuk menjalankan sistem operasi, jalankan program lebih cepat, dan transfer file. Menyimpan file besar, performa lebih baik. Kecepatan Baca dan Tulis 100 MB / s 120 MB / s Biaya Lebih murah Lebih mahal Mempercepat Lebih lambat Sekitar 20 hingga 33% lebih cepat. Konsumsi daya kurang More Panas Menghasilkan lebih sedikit panas Menciptakan lebih banyak panas. Keuntungan Umur lebih panjang, kebisingan rendah, dll. Kinerja tinggi Apa itu 5400 RPM Hard Drive? Hard drive dengan putaran rata-rata 5400 RPM paling cocok untuk kebutuhan berjalan sistem operasi, menjalankan program lebih cepat, mentransfer file, dll. Kecepatan rotasi yang lebih tinggi pada hard drive dapat mengurangi penundaan rotasi rata-rata dan waktu baca dan tulis yang sebenarnya,tetapi juga memiliki kelemahan yang dapat dilihat dalam bentuk peningkatan temperatur, peningkatan keausan motor spindle, peningkatan kebisingan operasi, dan sebagainya. Salah satu keuntungan terbesar dari hard drive 5400 RPM adalah relatif lebih terjangkau, yang artinya sangat populer di kalangan pelajar dan ini mungkin tidak populer di kalangan profesional karena kecepatannya lebih lambat, dengan kecepatan baca dan tulis rata-rata 100 MB/s. Pengurangan konsumsi energi, keluaran panas yang kecil, kebisingan yang rendah, dan masa pakai yang lebih lama merupakan keuntungan dari hard disk 5400 RPM. Kecepatan rotasi yang lebih tinggi pada hard drive dapat mengurangi penundaan rotasi rata-rata dan waktu baca dan tulis yang sebenarnya. Teknologi SSHD generasi ketiga dibangun di atas HDD 5,400 RPM Platform dan mengungguli produk generasi sebelumnya, yang dibangun di atas platform HDD 7,200 RPM. Notebook biasanya menggunakan hard drive 5400 RPM karena pembuangan panas dan persyaratan portabilitas. Jika semua kondisi lain tetap konstan, waktu pengoperasian baterai akan berkurang. Itu dilihat sebagai pilihan yang layak untuk menyimpan file besar. Apa itu 7200 RPM Hard Drive? Secara historis, hard drive 7200 RPM menawarkan kecepatan baca dan tulis yang cepat dan lebih cocok untuk menjalankan sistem operasi, menjalankan aplikasi dengan cepat, dan mentransfer file. Hard drive 7200 RPM memiliki kelemahan tertentu. Hal utama yang memengaruhi keputusan seseorang adalah harganya lebih faktor lainnya adalah mereka membutuhkan lebih banyak daya, menghasilkan lebih banyak panas, lebih berisik, dll. Umurnya juga, rata-rata, lebih pendek daripada hard drive dengan RPM lebih rendah. Drive 7,200 RPM akan mengirimkan data sekitar 20% hingga 33% lebih cepat daripada drive 5,400 RPM. Akibatnya, parameter ini sangat penting saat menentukan kinerja hard disk yang diproyeksikan atau membandingkan model HDD yang berbeda. Selain itu, hard drive 7200 rpm menghasilkan kebisingan yang lebih besar daripada hard drive 5400 rpm. Jika Anda hanya memiliki satu atau dua hard disk, ini mungkin bukan masalah yang jika Anda memiliki beberapa hal yang beroperasi pada saat yang sama, kebisingan kumulatif bisa sangat ditambah dengan konsumsi daya yang lebih rendah, adalah salah satu alasan mengapa beberapa server lebih memilih hard drive 5400 rpm daripada hard drive 7200 rpm. Kecepatan putarannya lebih cepat dibandingkan hard disk dengan kecepatan putaran 5400 RPM. Kecepatan baca dan tulis 7200 RPM rata-rata 120 MB/s, sedangkan kecepatan 5400 RPM adalah 100 MB/s. Perbedaan Utama Antara 5400 dan 7200 RPM Hard DrivesHard drive 5400 RPM paling cocok untuk individu yang ingin menjalankan sistem operasi, menjalankan program lebih cepat, dan mentransfer file dengan lebih efisien. Di sisi lain, hard drive 7200 RPM paling cocok untuk individu yang mencari file besar, performa lebih baik, dan kecepatan lebih cepat. Kecepatan baca dan tulis rata-rata 5400 RPM adalah 100 MB/dtk, sedangkan kecepatan baca dan tulis rata-rata 7200 RPM adalah 120 MB/dtk. 7200 RPM lebih mahal, sedangkan hard drive 5400 RPM cenderung lebih terjangkau. Kecepatan keseluruhan hard drive 5400 RPM lebih lambat dibandingkan dengan hard drive 7200 RPM yang cenderung sekitar 20% hingga 33% lebih cepat. Konsumsi daya hard drive 7200 RPM secara komparatif lebih dari hard drive 5400 RPM. 5400 RPM menghasilkan jumlah panas yang lebih sedikit dibandingkan dengan 7200 RPM. Beberapa keuntungan dari 5400 RPM termasuk masa pakai yang lebih lama, kebisingan rendah, dll. Beberapa keuntungan dari 7200 RPM adalah kinerjanya yang tinggi. Referensi Sandeep Bhandari meraih gelar Bachelor of Engineering in Computers dari Thapar University 2006. Beliau memiliki pengalaman selama 20 tahun di bidang teknologi. Dia memiliki minat dalam berbagai bidang teknis, termasuk sistem database, jaringan komputer, dan pemrograman. Anda dapat membaca lebih lanjut tentang dia di nya halaman bio. Perbedaan hardisk 5400rpm dengan 7200rpm itu apa saja? Buat yang bingung dan penasaran, mari kita bahas saja di sini. Sebab dua varian ini memang kerap membuat bingung. – Asssalamu’alaikum. Kembali lagi pada artikel kami. Kali ini kita akan membahas mengenai HDD 5400rpm dan 7200rpm. Jika kita sering menggunakan komputer atau laptop, mungkin sudah tidak asing lagi dengan istilah Hardisk 5400rpm dan 7200rpm. Kedua jenis hardisk ini memang sering dibandingkan satu sama lain karena memang memiliki perbedaan yang cukup signifikan. Namun, apa saja perbedaan antara Hardisk 5400rpm dan 7200rpm? Simak ulasan lengkapnya di bawah ini. Perbedaan Hardisk 5400rpm dengan 7200rpm itu Apa Saja? 1. Perbedaan Harga Saat membeli hardisk, salah satu pertimbangan yang biasanya dilakukan adalah harga. Dalam hal ini, perbedaan harga antara Hardisk 5400rpm dengan 7200rpm memang cukup terlihat. Dengan merek dan fitur yang setara, hardisk 7200rpm akan lebih mahal dibandingkan dengan hardisk 5400rpm. Namun, kita juga harus memperhatikan performa dan fitur yang ditawarkan oleh masing-masing jenis hardisk sebelum memutuskan untuk membelinya. 2. Perbedaan Performa Perbedaan performa adalah salah satu faktor utama mengapa orang memilih Hardisk 7200rpm. Dalam hal kecepatan proses kerja, hardisk 7200rpm akan bekerja lebih baik dibandingkan dengan hardisk 5400rpm. Hal ini terlihat saat proses copy data atau proses kerja lainnya. Meskipun pada beberapa pengujian perbedaan antara kedua jenis hardisk ini tidak terlalu signifikan, namun secara umum, hardisk 7200rpm lebih cepat dan lebih efektif dalam bekerja. 3. Perbedaan Konsumsi Daya Salah satu kelemahan dari Hardisk 7200rpm adalah konsumsi dayanya yang lebih boros dibandingkan dengan Hardisk 5400rpm. Hal ini bisa jadi pertimbangan jika kita ingin memilih jenis hardisk yang hemat listrik. Namun, meskipun Hardisk 7200rpm lebih boros, perbedaannya tidak terlalu signifikan. 4. Perbedaan Putaran Cakram Putaran cakram adalah salah satu faktor penting yang menentukan performa dari sebuah hardisk. Hardisk 7200rpm memiliki putaran cakram yang lebih kencang dibandingkan dengan Hardisk 5400rpm. Dalam kondisi kerja maksimal, Hardisk 7200rpm dapat berputar sebanyak 7200 kali per menit, sementara Hardisk 5400rpm hanya berputar sebanyak 5400 kali per menit. Hal ini juga merupakan salah satu alasan mengapa Hardisk 7200rpm lebih cepat dan lebih efektif dalam bekerja. 5. Perbedaan Panas Salah satu kelemahan dari Hardisk 7200rpm adalah panas yang dihasilkan cenderung lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Hardisk 5400rpm. Hal ini terjadi karena putaran cakram yang lebih kencang pada Hardisk 7200rpm. Namun, perlu diingat bahwa setiap jenis hardisk memiliki batas suhu yang berbeda-beda. Oleh karena itu, pastikan hardisk kita tidak terlalu panas karena bisa memengaruhi performa dan umur hardisk. Video Kesimpulan Perbedaan Hardisk 5400rpm dengan 7200rpm Dalam artikel ini, telah dibahas mengenai perbedaan antara hardisk 5400rpm dan 7200rpm. Dari informasi yang disajikan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan antara kedua jenis hardisk tersebut. Pertama, dalam hal harga, hardisk 7200rpm lebih mahal dibandingkan dengan 5400rpm dengan merek dan fitur yang setara. Kedua, dari segi performa, hardisk 7200rpm akan bekerja lebih baik dan lebih cepat dibandingkan dengan hardisk 5400rpm, meskipun perbedaannya tidak selalu signifikan. Ketiga, hardisk 7200rpm akan lebih boros listrik dibandingkan dengan hardisk 5400rpm. Keempat, putaran cakram hardisk 7200rpm lebih kencang dibandingkan dengan hardisk 5400rpm, sehingga kinerjanya lebih baik. Kelima, hardisk 7200rpm cenderung menghasilkan panas yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hardisk 5400rpm. Dengan memahami perbedaan-perbedaan tersebut, pengguna hardisk dapat memilih jenis hardisk yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan anggaran. Jika membutuhkan kecepatan dan performa yang lebih baik, maka hardisk 7200rpm mungkin merupakan pilihan yang lebih baik. Namun, jika ingin menghemat biaya dan energi listrik, maka hardisk 5400rpm dapat menjadi alternatif yang baik. Oleh karena itu, sebelum memutuskan untuk membeli hardisk, perlu dipertimbangkan kebutuhan dan ketersediaan anggaran untuk memilih jenis hardisk yang paling tepat. Artikel ini kami cukupkan sampai di sini, akhir kata semoga bermanfaat dan sampai jumpa. Wassalamu’alaikum.

perbedaan hdd 5400rpm dengan 7200rpm